What’s natural about nature? deceptive concepts in socio-scientific decision-making

Journal Title: European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education - Year 2015, Vol 3, Issue 3

Abstract

The conflicts between nature and nurture are brought to the fore and challenges socio-scientific decision-making in science education. The multitude of meanings of these concepts and their roles in societal discourses can impede students’ development of understanding for different perspectives, e.g. on gene technology. This study problematizes students’ use of “nature” and “naturalness” to further the development of the experience of science education in relation to the nature-nurture debate. We build on the social constructivism view that present conceptions of nature and naturalness emanate from historical and modern social constructions of nature. Claims presented by upper secondary school students in interviews actualizing the control of human actions pertaining to treatments for hereditary diseases by making use of concepts of “nature” and “naturalness were analysed. The students suggested control of human activity on different levels of biological organisation, either from within the Romantic view or the Enlightenment view on nature. The Romantic view provided students with moral grounds for consistently preserve what is considered as nature and means to bolster their reasoning by referring to the balance in nature, the purity of nature, and the laws of nature. The Enlightenment view provided students with means to support gene technology by embedding “nurture” into the concept “nature” by using knowledge while implying that nurture is a natural way to overcome such imperfections of nature. We propose that these conflicting views should be addressed in biological education to promote students’ understanding of contemporary discourses dependent on the different concepts of nature and nurture.

Authors and Affiliations

Mats Gunnar Lindahl| Department of Chemistry and Biomedicine, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden, For correspondence: mats.lindahl@lnu.se, Cedric Linder| Department of Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Keywords

Related Articles

A case study on teaching of energy as a subject for 9th graders

This study aims to describe how energy subject is taught in 9th grades. The study is designed as a descriptive case study with the participation of 3 physics teachers and 85 students. Data were obtained through observati...

Social media and social networking applications for teaching and learning

This paper aims to better understand the experiences of the youth and the educators with the tapping of social media like YouTube videos and the social networking application of Facebook for teaching and learning. This...

Two concepts of radiation - a case study investigating existing preconceptions

Conceptual Change is a widely accepted theoretical framework for science education. Setting up successful learning and teaching arrangements in this framework necessarily entails including students´ preconceptions into t...

Enhancing laos students’ understanding of nature of science in physics learning about atom for peace

This paper aimed to study of Grade 12 students’ understanding of nature of science in learning about atom for peace through science technology and society (STS) approach. Participants were 51 Grade 12 who study in Thongp...

Research on mathematical literacy in schools - Aim, approach and attention

The development of mathematical literacy in schools is of significant concern at the policy level, and research is an important source of information in this process. This review article focuses on areas of research inte...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP8068
  • DOI -
  • Views 359
  • Downloads 26

How To Cite

Mats Gunnar Lindahl, Cedric Linder (2015). What’s natural about nature? deceptive concepts in socio-scientific decision-making. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 250-264. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-8068