A Comparative study of I-gel for general anesthesia in obese and non-obese patients at tertiary health care centre

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2019, Vol 9, Issue 1

Abstract

Background: The I-gel supraglottic airway device (Intersurgical Ltd, Wokingham, Berkshire, UK) was developed in 2007 to overcome the limitations of Proseal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) Aims and Objectives: To study I-gel for general anesthesia in obese and non-obese patients at tertiary health care centre. Methodology: This was cross-sectional study carried out in the department of anesthesiology the one year period during January 2017 to January 2018; in one year period there were 30 non obese individuals and 30 obese individuals were enrolled to study after a written explained consent. All the patients undergone i-gel insertion for General anesthesia. OLP in the patients was measured by closing the adjustable pressure limiting valve of the circle breathing system and noting the pressure at which leak developed (detected by a stethoscope placed just lateral to thyroid cartilage) at fresh gas flow of 3 L/min. The statistical analysis was done by chi-square test and analyzed by SPSS 19 version software. Result: In our study we have seen that The parameters were comparable with each other especially like OLP (CM of H2O )- 26.78 ±3.92 And 28.45 ± 4.56 (p>0.05); LF - 7.91 ± 3.45 and 8.98 ± 3.54 (p>0.05); Time to insert i-gel (s) 15.45 ± 5.86 and 18.1 ± 4.56 (p>0.05) . The grade of ease of insertion was more in Obese individuals was more as compared to non-obese individuals this was statistically significant (X2=7.36,df=2,p<0.02) .The no. of attempts were more in Obese individuals as compared to non obese individuals this was statistically significant (X2=6.955,df=2,p<0.03) Conclusion: It can be concluded from our study that i-gel insertion was comparable with obese and non-obese individuals except to ease of insertion and no. of attempts required more .

Authors and Affiliations

Dantoor Suresh, Nunavath Surya

Keywords

Related Articles

Comparative evaluation of the effect of intrathecal ketamine and fentanyl added to bupivacaine in elective hernia repair surgeries

Background: Addition of adjuvants in spinal anaesthesia spares the local anaesthetic dose and produces good postoperative analgesia. Aim: To compare the duration of prolongation of postoperative analgesia between Ketamin...

Evaluation of intubating conditions using dexmedetomidine - fentanyl combination versus dexmedetomidine alone for awake nasal fiberoptic intubation

Aims and Objective: Awake fiberoptic intubation is one of the principal techniques of intubation in patients with difficult airway. The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine- Fentanyl combi...

Hemodynamic properties and respiratory efforts: A comparative study between etomidate and propofol

Background: A successful general anaesthesia is defined as a reversible triad of hypnosis, analgesia and abolition of reflex activity. Over years, there has been a continuous search for better and safer intravenous agent...

Evaluation of the accuracy of finger-tip palpation of pilot balloon as amethod to judge endo tracheal tube cuff pressure

Aims and Objectives- To check the reliability of finger tip palpation of pilot balloon to judge the ETT cuff Pressure, to record the volume required to achieve the ETT cuff pressure of 25 cm H2O. Material and Methods- To...

A study of general anesthesia versus cervical block for the surgery of thyroid at tertiary health care center

Background: Historically, Thyroid and parathyroid surgery was done initially under local anesthesia. Aims and Objectives: To study General anesthesia versus cervical block for the surgery of thyroid at tertiary health ca...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP440075
  • DOI 10.26611/1015911
  • Views 234
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dantoor Suresh, Nunavath Surya (2019). A Comparative study of I-gel for general anesthesia in obese and non-obese patients at tertiary health care centre. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 9(1), 1-3. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-440075