Allowing repeat winners

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2010, Vol 5, Issue 5

Abstract

Unbiased lotteries seem the least unfair and simplest procedures to allocate scarce indivisible resources to those with equal claims. But, when lotteries are repeated, it is not immediately obvious whether prior winners should be included or excluded. As in design questions surrounding single-shot lotteries, considerations of self-interest and distributive social preferences may interact. We investigate preferences for allowing participation of earlier winners in sequential lotteries. We found a strong preference for exclusion, both in settings where subjects were involved, and those where they were not. Subjects who answered questions about both settings did not differ in their tendency to prefer exclusion. Stated rationales significantly predicted choice but did not predict switching of choices between the two settings.

Authors and Affiliations

Marco D. Huesch, and Richard Brady

Keywords

Related Articles

The wisdom of crowds: Predicting a weather and climate-related event

Environmental uncertainty is at the core of much of human activity, ranging from daily decisions by individuals to long-term policy planning by governments. Yet, there is little quantitative evidence on the ability of no...

It’s personal: The effect of personal value on utilitarian moral judgments

We investigated whether the personal importance of objects influences utilitarian decision-making in which damaging property is necessary to produce an overall positive outcome. In Experiment 1, participants judged savin...

Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A model-based analysis of choice, confidence, and response time

Research on the processing of recognition information has focused on testing the recognition heuristic (RH). On the aggregate, the noncompensatory use of recognition information postulated by the RH was rejected in sever...

Criteria for performance evaluation

Using a cognitive task (mental calculation) and a perceptual-motor task (stylized golf putting), we examined differential proficiency using the CWS index and several other quantitative measures of performance. The CWS in...

An illusion of control modulates the reluctance to tempt fate

The tempting fate effect is that the probability of a fateful outcome is deemed higher following an action that “tempts” the outcome than in the absence of such an action. In this paper we evaluate the hypothesis that th...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677752
  • DOI -
  • Views 125
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Marco D. Huesch, and Richard Brady (2010). Allowing repeat winners. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(5), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-677752