Disinfectant and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profilesof Salmonella Strains from Feedlot Water-Sprinkled Cattle: Hides and Feces

Journal Title: Journal of Food Chemistry and Nanotechnology - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 2

Abstract

The disinfectant and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 145 Salmonella strains obtained from feedlot water-sprinkled cattle were determined. A low prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) was observed, resistance was primarily observed to streptomycin (29.7%) and sulfamethoxazole (8.3%). All strains were susceptible to the 8 fluoroquinolones tested. The most common AMR traits were streptomycin resistance in serovar Kentucky, sulfamethoxazole resistance in Muenster and Cerro and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid-ceftiofur resistance in Meleagridis. Salmonella were more resistant to the disinfectants P-I, DC&R and Tek-Trol and disinfectant component THN than to other disinfectants. All strains were susceptible to triclosan, and all strains were resistant to chlorhexidine. Nearly 1/3 of the strains had low level resistance to benzalkonium chloride. The benzyl ammonium chlorides (BACs) C12, C14 and C16 were the most active ingredient in the disinfectant DC&R. C14BAC and C16BAC were shown to be more active as a disinfectant than was C12BAC. Didecyldimethyl ammonium chloride (C10AC) was the most active ingredient in the disinfectant P-128, and the most active ammonium chloride in this work and in all of our previous studies. No cross-resistance was observed. All manufacturer recommended application levels were above the observed MICs. However, observed MICs for DC&R and Tek-Trol were close to the suggested application rates and a small error in the disinfectant dilution could easily render these disinfects non-functional. The continued use of THN and formaldehyde in DC&R is questionable because these components are not effective, and their inclusion results only in additional unwanted chemicals in the environment.

Authors and Affiliations

Ross C. Beier, Todd R. Callaway, Kathleen Andrews, Toni L. Poole, Tawni L. Crippen, Robin C. Anderson, David J. Nisbet

Keywords

Related Articles

Lutein and β-Carotene in Selected Asian Leafy Vegetables

Carotenoids, such as lutein and β-carotene are generally recognized as antioxidants. However, only β-carotene has the pro-vitamin A activity. This study determined lutein and β-carotene in Asian leafy vegetables using re...

Acknowledgement of Manuscript Reviewers JFCN Volume - 4 (2018)

The Editors of Journal of Food Chemistry & Nanotechnology (JFCN) would like to express their tremendous gratitude to all those individuals who participated in the peer review process during the preparation of this Volume...

Volatile Compounds from Must and Wines from Five White Grape Varieties

Viticulture and wine production in challenging environments such as cold and humid areas has substantially expanded in recent years, mostly due to the development of grapevine varieties that show high resistance to funga...

Fatty Acid Contents of Gamma Irradiated Sesame (Sesamumindicum L.) Peanut (Arachishypogaea L.) and Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Seeds

Fatty acids composition are an important attribute in oil. The present study aimed to evaluate three selected sources of oil namely, sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annu...

Free Amino Acids, Including Canavanine, in the Seeds from 24 Wild Mediterranean Legumes

Seeds with a high concentration of specific free amino acids may represent a green alternative to industrial scale fermentation as sources of specific amino acids. Legume seeds are particularly rich in free amino acids....

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP223371
  • DOI 10.17756/jfcn.2017-037
  • Views 120
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ross C. Beier, Todd R. Callaway, Kathleen Andrews, Toni L. Poole, Tawni L. Crippen, Robin C. Anderson, David J. Nisbet (2017). Disinfectant and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profilesof Salmonella Strains from Feedlot Water-Sprinkled Cattle: Hides and Feces. Journal of Food Chemistry and Nanotechnology, 3(2), 50-59. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-223371