Prefer a cash slap in your face over credit for halva

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2009, Vol 4, Issue 7

Abstract

We investigated how frequency and amount of punishment affect the decision making of Iranian subjects. In our first experiment, performing a computer-based Persian version of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), our subjects scored remarkably lower than their Western counterparts. Moreover, our subjects chose more frequently and more rapidly from decks that had less frequent but larger amounts of punishments in comparison to decks that had more frequent punishments with smaller amounts. In our second experiment, subjects did not differentiate between decks with the same frequency of punishment but with different punishment amounts. However, among decks with the same amount but different frequency of punishment, a significant preference was apparent towards decks with less frequency of punishment. Our results differ from previous studies, indicating a different strategy in risky decision making among healthy adult Iranian subjects, as they show low attention to the amount of punishment and are more concerned with the frequency of punishment.

Authors and Affiliations

Hamed Ekhtiari, Ali Jannati, Morteza Dehghani and Azarakhsh Mokri

Keywords

Related Articles

Individuals’ insight into intrapersonal externalities

An intrapersonal externality exists when an individual’s decisions affect the outcomes of her future decisions. It can result in decreasing or increasing average returns to the rate of consumption, as occurs in addiction...

Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret

Previous research has demonstrated that consistency between people's behavior and their dispositions has predictive validity for judgments of regret. Research has also shown that differences in the personality variable o...

Nudge to nobesity II: Menu positions influence food orders

“Very small but cumulated decreases in food intake may be sufficient to have significant effects, even erasing obesity over a period of years” (Rozin et al., 2011). In two studies, one a lab study and the other a real-wo...

A study of fairness judgments in China, Switzerland and Canada: Do culture, being a student, and gender matter?

This study compares judgments of the fairness of economic actions among survey populations in Switzerland, and both student and non-student groups in the People’s Republic of China, with the earlier Kahneman, Knetsch and...

Why recognition is rational: Optimality results on single-variable decision rules

The Recognition Heuristic (Gigerenzer & Goldstein, 1996; Goldstein & Gigerenzer, 2002) makes the counter-intuitive prediction that a decision maker utilizing less information may do as well as, or outperform, an idealize...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677710
  • DOI -
  • Views 136
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Hamed Ekhtiari, Ali Jannati, Morteza Dehghani and Azarakhsh Mokri (2009). Prefer a cash slap in your face over credit for halva. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(7), -. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-677710