PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETATION FROM GERMAN INTO UKRAINIAN. SEMANTIC ASPECTS

Abstract

This article deals with the translation process, namely the semantic translation problems, analyzes the classification of translation methods and their place in the translation system. The focus of the article is the analysis of the semantic transformations used in the translation. The methods used in analyzing the translation, consecutive and simultaneous interpretation as two types of interpretation of political speeches were identified, as well as their advantages and disadvantages in translating conference proceedings. Translation solutions are the most appropriate tools that allow an interpreter to quickly and purposefully develop certain knowledge about the facts and their forms of implementation in the communication. One of the psycholinguistic concepts is that the translation process itself can be represented as the interaction of linguistic reflexes and methodological reflections. It was proved that only some of the theoretically mentioned methods are used in the translation. The reason is that the translator usually chooses the easiest method of translation, which allows you to make the most accurate translation without much time. The analysis of semantic methods indicates a relative reduction in existing options for translation. This feature can be regarded as a regularity, and it is caused both by the difference in the semantic system of the German and Ukrainian languages, as well as by the general tendency to reduce the incoming information in the translation. Unlike translation, which allows writing to overcome long distances in time and space, interpretation in principle serves to facilitate communication between different cultures. The article analyzes the body of interpretation, its structure and features. Therefore, the new in the article is that: аn analysis is offered before the interpretation; the main principles of the choice of the method of transfer and their influence on the situation and the actual translation process are considered; the dependence of the translator on the choice of sociocultural aspects of the outgoing text is proved; contrasted versions of translation and analyzed their advantages and disadvantages.

Authors and Affiliations

Zinaida Chupurna, Helena Lysenko

Keywords

Related Articles

PECULIARITIES IN TRANSLATION OF FRENCH PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS INTO UKRAINIAN LANGUAGE

The article describes and analyses the principal ways of the translation of the French phraseological units and the difficulties that appear depending on their peculiarities, semantic integrity and complexity. The transl...

LINGUOPRAGMATIC FEATURES OF THE IDIOSTYLE OF ERICH KÄSTNER

The paper deals with characteristic linguopragmatic features of idiostyle of E. Kästner. Humor, satire, gaiety, cheerfulness, irony and little biographic features are his poetry’s nature. E. Kästner’s poetic texts are ci...

DISCURSIVE TROPES IN THE ENGLISH POLITICAL POETRY OF THE XXI CENTURY

The article is devoted to the analysis of the peculiarities of discursive tropes, which are explored on the case study of political poetry of the XXI century, the mechanism of operating the tropes is defined. The main ch...

WORD-FORMATION ASPECT OF NEW WORDS OF THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY

At the end of XX and the beginning of XXI centuries, due to the emergence of a large number of new terms and culture-specific concepts which require language designation, the sphere of information technologies and teleco...

NEW PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN GERMAN (ON THE MATERIAL IN THE 2000s AND THE 2010s)

The article deals with the phraseological developments in Modern German in the 2000s and 2010s. The study is based on author’s corpus of 80 phraseological units. It also examines the terms «neologism» and the classificat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP635219
  • DOI -
  • Views 73
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Zinaida Chupurna, Helena Lysenko (2018). PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETATION FROM GERMAN INTO UKRAINIAN. SEMANTIC ASPECTS. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія: “Лінгвістика”, 31(), 241-246. https://europub.co.uk./articles/-A-635219