Southern Cis-Urals in the Great Migration Period – Archaeological and Geographical Context
Journal Title: Поволжская Археология - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 22
Abstract
The article considers the geography of studied archaeological sites dating back to the first half of the 1st Millennium A.D. located in the steppes of the Southern Urals and the Lower Volga region. According to the author, the localization of these sites follows a specific pattern. Barrows of late Sarmatians (or ‘Huns-Sarmatians’) are mostly located in the forest-steppe area or along the left bank of the Volga river, which was accounted for by the deterioration of the steppe climate (aridization) which began in the first centuries A.D. A small number of barrows of late Sarmatians have been discovered in the Trans-Urals and the Volga region. Large burial mounds consisting of several dozen barrows - Salikhovo, Akhmerovo, Derbenevo - have only been traced in the Cis-Urals. There is no reliable evidence of the ethnic-cultural interactions of the Sarmatians with the local Finno-Ugric population. Therefore, the Turbasly culture with its sites represented by two compact groups have been discovered in the basin of the middle reaches of the Belaya river and near the mouth of the Kama river and apparently appeared in the region in an established form. At the same time, small groups (military detachments) of the population of a different ethnic and cultural origin were introduced in the western regions of the area populated by the carriers of the late Mazunino culture - barrows at Turaevo and Staraya Mushta burial mounds. Due to their scarcity, these detachments quickly dissolved in the local Finno-Perm (Mazunino) population. The archaeological map of the Southern Urals and Trans-Volga region demonstrates that the steppes of the region were very poorly populated in the first half of the 1st Millennium A.D. The ethnic-cultural groups represented by a large number of archaeological sites have only been discovered in the forest-steppe area – these are the Late Mazunino (Bakhmutino) and Imenkovo cultures, whose carriers, according to the author, did not belong to the Sarmatian or ‘Hun-Sarmatian’ world.
Authors and Affiliations
Vladimir Ivanov
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP251848
- DOI 10.24852/pa2017.4.22.8.23
- Views 89
- Downloads 0
Late Neolithic Complex of the Gulyukovo I Site in the Lower Kama Region
The article features an analysis of the Neolithic portion of the Gulyukovo I site – a multilayer monument of the Neolithic and Late Bronze Age periods. The Neolithic ceramics discovered at the site is classified into thr...
Archaeological and numismatical findings from the vicinitie of Bolshiye Atrjasi village (Tetjushy district of Tatarstan Republic)
The objects found at Big Atrjasi village in the Tetjushy district of Tatarstan is considered in article. The village is known by the unique cemetery with stone gravestones of 1314 – 1323. Three hidden treasures of silver...
Results of Detailed Magnetic Surveying in the Territory of Bolgar Fortified Settlement in 2012–2015
The article considers the results of magnetic surveys conducted in the territory of Bolgar State Historical and Architectural Museum-Reserve in 2012–2015. The territory of Bolgar Historical and Architectural Museum-Reser...
Muslim Archaeology: Scope and Content of the Concept
The authors address the concept of ‘Muslim Archaeology’, which is treated as a scientific discipline and a special direction in antiquity studies, against a broad background of similar disciplines, such as Biblical Archa...
Comprehensive Studies by Bilyar Archaeological Expedition
The paper features a summary of the comprehensive studies of archaeological sites in the largest medieval urban centre of the pre-Mongol Volga Bolgaria – Bilyar (the Great Town) and its neighbouring areas. The article fe...